Skip to content
Points of Match

Written and checked by Teodora VulićComparisons editor

What the cashier names

Twenty operators print what they pay in, from forty currencies to one

Twenty of the fifty operators here publish a coin list that can be counted. The longest names 40 currencies, the shortest names one, and across the twenty 51 different tickers appear. Only Bitcoin is in all twenty. The BitStarz cell is blank, and that blank belongs to this reading rather than to the operator.

Twenty of the fifty operators on this site publish a list of the currencies they take. The other thirty do not, or did not in what was read, and their cells stay blank.

What each operator publishes about itself: the company named on the licence, the permit number and where it was read, and how many countries the operator excludes in its own terms. Similarity here is a count with a denominator printed beside it — BitStarz names 74 countries, and an operator's overlap is stated as a share of those 74. An operator whose own list was not read carries nothing to compare rather than a low score, because an unread list is not evidence of difference. An empty cell means the document was not read — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
CasinoOperatorLicenceCountries barredWithdrawal limitVisit
Vavepaid placementLatcas B.V.Curaçao Gaming Authoritylist not readfrom 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8Visit
BitStarzGareton B.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority74not published
Oshi CasinoNovatrix SRLAnjouan Gaming Board224not published
PlayAmoNovatrix SRLAnjouan Gaming Board217not published
BitdreamsHollycorn N.V.Antillephone N.V.216not published
7Bit Casinonot publishedCuraçao Gaming Authority216not published
BitkingzNovatrix SRLAnjouan Gaming Board218not published
MiraxScores55 Tech B.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority220not published
SlotumNovatrix SRLAnjouan Gaming Board216not published
MetaspinsMetaspins N.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority58not published
CryptoLeoUno Digital Media B.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority74not published
Bets.ioBets Entertainment N.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority revoked42not published

The twenty, longest first

OperatorCurrencies named
Cloudbet40
CryptoGames15
Rakebit15
Rocketpot13
Wolf.bet13
Bets.io12
Wild.io12
DuckDice10
Oshi Casino10
Wild Fortune10
TrustDice9
Metaspins8
CryptoLeo7
PlayAmo7
Shuffle6
Vave6
Bitdreams5
Playbet.io3
Winz.io2
KatsuBet1

One list is an outlier and the rest are a cluster. Take Cloudbet out and the remaining nineteen run from 15 down to 1, with a median of 8.

The BitStarz cell holds nothing. That is our reading rather than the operator's cashier, and this page says so before it says anything else, because a blank read as a zero is the single commonest error in this whole subject.

Fifty-one tickers, one of them universal

Across the twenty lists, 51 distinct tickers appear.

Exactly one is in all twenty: Bitcoin. Ether reaches nineteen, Litecoin sixteen, Tether under that ticker fifteen, Dogecoin fourteen. Then Bitcoin Cash and XRP at eleven, Cardano at ten, Tron, BNB and Solana at nine, USD Coin at eight, and Toncoin at four.

Twenty-nine of the 51 tickers appear in exactly one list. Eighteen of those 29 are Cloudbet's alone, which is what a 40-name list produces when the other nineteen average eight.

So the shape of this column is a very short common core and a long tail belonging to one operator. A reader who deals in Bitcoin has twenty answers; a reader who deals in anything past the first ten tickers has two or three.

A drawing of a fennec fox in a pale blue coat holding up a phone in one paw and pointing at its screen with the other
A drawing, made for this page — an illustration rather than anyone’s screen. What a phone shows during play is never the ceiling; the ceiling sits in a numbered clause, and the seven read here are quoted with the clause number beside each one. Four different windows are in play across them — a day, a week, a month, a single transaction — so the raw figures do not rank against each other, and flattening them into one column would invent a comparison the terms do not support.

Four cashiers that name no dollar stablecoin

This is the finding worth carrying away from the table, because it is invisible in the counts.

Sixteen of the twenty name at least one dollar-pegged currency. Four name none: Bitdreams lists Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin, Dogecoin and XRP; Playbet.io lists Bitcoin, Solana and Ether; Winz.io lists Bitcoin and Ether; KatsuBet lists Bitcoin.

For anybody who holds a balance in an account rather than moving it straight out, that is a material difference. A balance held in Bitcoin is a balance exposed to Bitcoin, and a bonus wagering requirement measured in a coin that moves 10 per cent overnight is a different requirement on the second day.

Two operators list Tether under tickers that mark the chain rather than the asset — Rocketpot names USDTE and USDTT separately — which is a more informative way of publishing the same thing, because the chain is what decides the fee and the confirmation time.

What a coin list settles

It settles what the operator names. That is genuinely useful, because it is checkable from outside and it is written by the party that has to honour it.

It settles nothing about cost. Network fees belong to the network, and conversion spreads belong to the operator's own rate, and neither appears in a currency list.

It settles nothing about speed, and this is where the whole table is at its weakest. Across all fifty records here, a payout processing window with a clause number behind it was recorded exactly once, at Vave, whose clause 8.1 gives three working days. Every other row, BitStarz included, is blank on that field. A cashier naming 40 currencies and a cashier naming one are equally silent about when the money moves.

And it settles nothing about withdrawal in the same coin. A list of accepted deposit currencies is not automatically a list of payout currencies, and no document read for this table separates the two.

One more thing the column cannot show is the chain. Tether exists on several networks, and so does USD Coin, and the fee and confirmation time for a transfer differ by more between two chains carrying the same ticker than they do between two different tickers on one chain. Eighteen of the twenty lists print tickers alone, which means the number in the table describes assets while the thing a reader actually pays for is a route. That is a real limit on the column, and it applies to the 40-name list as much as to the one-name list.

The counts should therefore be read as a disclosure measure and nothing more. Twenty operators wrote down what they take; thirty either did not, or wrote it somewhere this reading never opened. The first group can be held to what it printed, and that is the entire advantage the column captures.

Visit

Where this column sits among the others

The coin list is one of the softer checks on this site, for a reason worth stating: it reads a cashier page rather than a numbered clause, so a missing entry may mean an unread page rather than an unsupported currency. The checks that read clauses behave differently.

What sits in each lobby, counted the same way from published catalogues, is at sixty-two studios and sixteen lists. Which of these fifty share a company or a permit number behind the shopfront — six clusters covering eighteen rows — is at one permit, several brands. And what the operator this site is named after does and does not publish about money leaving is at seven ceilings read of twelve.

Questions people actually type

Which alternative accepts the most cryptocurrencies?
Cloudbet, whose published list names 40 currencies — more than twice the next longest. CryptoGames and Rakebit name 15 apiece, Wolf.bet and Rocketpot 13, Bets.io and Wild.io 12. At the short end KatsuBet names one and Winz.io two. Those are counts of what each operator prints, not of what a cashier screen might show after logging in.
Which coins turn up almost everywhere?
Bitcoin is in all twenty lists and Ether in nineteen. Litecoin appears in sixteen, Tether under that ticker in fifteen, Dogecoin in fourteen. Below those five the agreement thins fast: Bitcoin Cash and XRP reach eleven, Cardano ten, Tron, BNB and Solana nine each, and USD Coin eight.
Why is the BitStarz coin list empty here?
Because it was not read. The coin field stayed empty when this record was assembled, so no figure is printed for which currencies BitStarz pays in. That is a gap on our side and never a property of the operator, and it is the reason this page compares the twenty to each other rather than to a BitStarz baseline.
Does a long coin list mean faster or cheaper payouts?
It means neither, and the two get confused constantly. A currency list says which assets a cashier names. What it costs to move one, how long the network takes, and what the operator's own processing window is are three separate questions answered by three separate clauses — and across all fifty records here, a processing window with a clause number behind it was recorded exactly once.